|
|
Post by hawaii bill on Apr 6, 2019 19:51:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Super on Apr 7, 2019 6:57:55 GMT -5
Another example of puttig the players at a disadvantage. Coaches can leave but players often get "punished." |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2019 18:44:01 GMT -5
The grad transfer thing has turned into a joke. It was started because some kids genuinely wanted to study a particular field while still playing their sport. But it has turned into something completely different with the sport being the sole consideration. (as long as the new school has some degree program that the old school does not). And then oftentimes they don't even attend classes the 2nd semester. So with this new proposal you get two summers and two semesters to complete 36 credits or the new school ties up a ship for another year. Actually, it's not all that unreasonable. Maybe a little harsh since there are some pretty disloyal, immature kids out there, but not altogether unreasonable.
|
|
|
|
Post by iona1970 on Apr 9, 2019 6:35:03 GMT -5
The grad transfer thing has turned into a joke. It was started because some kids genuinely wanted to study a particular field while still playing their sport. But it has turned into something completely different with the sport being the sole consideration. (as long as the new school has some degree program that the old school does not). And then oftentimes they don't even attend classes the 2nd semester. So with this new proposal you get two summers and two semesters to complete 36 credits or the new school ties up a ship for another year. Actually, it's not all that unreasonable. Maybe a little harsh since there are some pretty disloyal, immature kids out there, but not altogether unreasonable. So how is it different from a one and done? Oh it hurts mid majors |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2019 21:38:56 GMT -5
It is different because there is no transfer with the one and done guys. A student decides on a college, attends for a year, and leaves to start a career because he is ready to start a career. And you're right it does hurt mids but that's collateral damage. I hate the grad transfer rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by gregcrow on Apr 10, 2019 23:04:58 GMT -5
It is different because there is no transfer with the one and done guys. A student decides on a college, attends for a year, and leaves to start a career because he is ready to start a career. And you're right it does hurt mids but that's collateral damage. I hate the grad transfer rule. Why? |
|
|
|
Post by iona1970 on Apr 10, 2019 23:57:10 GMT -5
It is different because there is no transfer with the one and done guys. A student decides on a college, attends for a year, and leaves to start a career because he is ready to start a career. And you're right it does hurt mids but that's collateral damage. I hate the grad transfer rule. Neither kid goes to school but stopping 5th yr transfers hurts mid majors and 1 and done don't go to mid majors that's the difference |
|
|
|
Post by Curt Hennig on Apr 11, 2019 14:28:52 GMT -5
Because of the way P5 schools abuse the transfer/grad transfer/hardship waiver systems, the NCAA almost has to make any transfer sit out. Remember, about 1% of these kids will be in a position to play in the NBA, so the redshirt year only helps with academic (remember that?), athletic, and personal development. End the meat market culture in college athletics. For 95-99% of kids, it needs to be about getting that degree for the day when playing is no longer an option.
Sometimes, I think people forget that it’s a CHOICE for players to sign on to play at an NCAA institution. They make that choice because it’s a pretty damn sweet deal across the board. Most of the 350+ D1 programs aren’t in the black like Duke, Kentucky, etc. You can’t apply wholesale rules to cater to a 1% population of next level players.
|
|
